| CD Bamako Roundtable |
|
|
|
On 5-6 September, 2006, the Community of Democracies Non-Governmental Process Africa regional discussion took place in Bamako, Mali. Mali will be hosting the fourth ministerial meeting of the Community of Democracies in late 2007, and the CD Non-Governmental Process has established its Executive Secretariat in Bamako. As a part of the CD Africa regional discussion, this Bamako Roundtable brought together over 20 participants to highlight key democracy issues in Africa and to develop recommendations to the CD member states. The ADF has been actively involved in the CD Africa regional discussion, and several ADF members participated in the Bamako Roundtable. To learn more about the Community of Democracies, please go to: www.ccd21.org To read a report on the Bamako Roundtable, pleace click here... The Bamako Roundtable on Democracy in Africa September 5-6, 2006 Organized by the Council for a Community of Democracies (CCD) A Report to the Governments of the Community of Democracies The Bamako Roundtable on Democracy in AfricaFrom September 5-6, the Council for a Community of Democracies (CCD) organized the Bamako Roundtable on Democracy in Africa with the help of a grant from the National Endowment for Democracy. The Roundtable benefited from having taken place immediately following the two-day meeting of the Management Committee of the African Democracy Forum (ADF) of the World Movement for Democracy and therefore had the participation of six members of the ADF leadership. Joining them were: Amb. Istvan Gyarmati, Director of the International Centre for Democratic Transition from Budapest Hungary, a Kenyan economist funded by the Center for International Private Enterprise, an authority on African elections made available by the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES), a Ghanaian Nigerian-based representative of the International Republican Institute, a U.K. representative of the Westminster Democracy Foundation, two Ghanaian experts recommended by the Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD), and representatives from Freedom House and the Democracy Coalition Project from the U.S. Mali-based representatives of the National Democratic Institute and the Netherlands Institute for Multi-Party Democracy as well as a representative of the United Nations Development Program also participated. Hosting the Roundtable was Dr.Oumar Makalou, President of the International Nongovernmental Secretariat of the Community of Democracies. The Secretariat, consisting of ten major Malian nongovernmental organizations was represented at the Roundtable by participants from several of its constituent NGO partners. Present at the opening of the Roundtable were Malian Foreign Minister Moctar Ouane, Diplomatic Counselor to the President, Mamadou Traore, Amb. Oumar Daou, Director of Political Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, UNDP Resident Representative Joseph Byll-Cataria and U.S. Ambassador to Mali, Terrance McCulley. Addressing delegates to the Roundtable, Minster Ouane spoke of Mali’s pride in hosting next year’s Fourth Ministerial Conference of the Community of Democracies. He voiced his country’s strong commitment to the partnership forged by the Community between governments and civil society the twin pillars of the democracy movement. During the two-day Roundtable, participants considered ten issues critical to advancing democracy in Africa and identified specific recommendations for action by the governments of the Community of Democracies. They successfully sought to link the efforts of the African Democracy Forum, the International Nongovernmental Secretariat based in Bamako and the Nongovernmental International Steering Committee of the Community of Democracies in order to advance the cause of democracy on the continent. Participants o Joseph Asunka, Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CCD-Ghana) o Daniel Bartha, International Centre for Democratic Transition, Budapest, Hungary o Augustin Cisse, Mali, Netherlands Institute for Multi-Party Democracy (IMD) o Maiga Djingary, Mali, Executive Secretariat of the Nongovernmental Process of the CD o Dohki Fassihian, U.S., Democracy Coalition Project o Hannah Forster, the Gambia, African Centre for Democracy and Human Rights Studies o Audrey Gadzekpo, Ghana, School of Communications, University of Ghana o Paul Graham, South Africa, Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA) o Amb. Istvan Gyarmati, Hungary, International Centre for Democratic Transition(ICDT) o Ryota Jonen, Japan, World Movement for Democracy o Josephat Juma, Kenya, Inter Regional Economic Network (IREN) o Mohamed Keita, Mali, Executive Secretariat of the Nongovernmental Process of the CD o Robert R. LaGamma, U.S., Council for a Community of Democracies o Charles Lasham, U.K. International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) o Oumar Makalou, Mali, Executive Secretariat of the Nongovernmental Process of the CD o Matthias Naab, Ghana, International Republican Institute o Marina Narnor, Ghana, Westminster Democracy Foundation o Ayo Obe, Nigeria, World Movement for Democracy o Raphael Ouattara, Cote d’Ivoire, National Democratic Institute (NDI) o Marc Traore, Mali, Executive Secretariat of the Nongovernmental Process of the CD o Juliet Ibekaku UmeEzeoke, Nigeria, Africa Democracy Forum o Dieudonne Zognong, Cameroon, Humanus Foundation Roundtable panels dealt with the following issues:
Here are the panels’ findings and recommendations: Panel #1 Gender Equality Introduction: In recent times, there has been significant paradigm shifts in favor of gender equality and advocacy coupled with significant interests in the discourse on gender/women issues. Significant political reforms have also invigorated civil society and energized women’s organizations and movements across Africa, providing fresh opportunities for non-state actors to mobilize around issue of gender equality. While acknowledging these critical and significant strides/changes (especially in the area of decision-making and representation, advocacy, etc.) it is generally acknowledged that a lot more still need to be done in advancing the course of gender and especially women in Africa. Problem Statement: It is imperative to underscore the many problems faced by women generally on the continent. The following is a summary of some of the problems identified by panelists: o Numerous human rights abuses against women o Society preference and recognition of male children o Increase in sexual abuses in schools, communities and work environments\ o Educational discrimination o Marriage: women generally have no say in the choice of their partner o General neglect of women’s rights o Rape: used as a strategic weapon in conflict and in war-torn countries o Lack of political will by national governments to legislate in favor of women’s rights (i.e. ratification and/or domestication of international conventions and protocols. o Other critical problems include: poverty, reproductive health and trafficking in women o Women in decision-making. o Violence against women. Recommendations
Women’s rights issues need to be incorporated in the early stages of democratization initiatives and not mid-way or at the end of the transition. Finally, gender equality is not about women taking power away from men, but women working with men in community development and as a result of women receiving their fair share of opportunities. Panel #2 Advancing Press Freedom in Africa The panel noted the tremendous growth of the African media resulting from re-democratization and the potential of the press to strengthen democracy. It assessed media performance as mixed, enumerating some of their strengths, weaknesses and external constraints as follows: Strengths o Exposing wrongdoing, corruption, bad governance o Compelling more political and public accountability o Providing a platform for public discussion and debate on local and national issues Weaknesses o Fragile and poorly capitalized thus their effectiveness is weak especially in the political arena o Weak corporate governance o Insufficient income to employ and train competent staff and properly gather and disseminate news o Lack of professionalism o Widespread unethical practices that undermine public interest. o Over-politicization of issues and political polarization o Prosecution of misleading and narrow agendas. o Competition and commercialization at the expense of editorial content o Hegemonic tendencies that do not provide adequate voice to voiceless External Constraints o Few journalism schools or sustained training opportunities for training and re- training professional journalists o Legal and political environment not conducive to the profession o No freedom of information acts o Increase in number of lawsuits and award of huge damages o Waning public support for media freedom o Attacks and harassment of journalists Recommendations Deriving from this assessment and the fact that the media are indispensable to democracy the following recommendations were made: 1. Deepening journalists’ democratic ethos and their sense of public responsibility through democracy training. 2. Helping journalists to improve their professional skills and ethics through training, including on specialized reporting. 3. Encouraging more editorial accountable and better corporate governance from media through training and technical assistance. 4. Addressing issues of media viability and sustainability through management training and technical support. 5. Increased advocacy on legal reforms and improved regulatory frameworks. 6. Stronger collaboration between democratically-minded civic groups and civil society organizations and the media. 7. Improving the information environment by advocating for enabling legislation such as Freedom of Information Acts 8. Teaching media literacy as part of civic and public education. 9. Protection of journalists from harassment. 10. Support for journalists’ groups Panel #3 Poverty, Democracy and Development The issues
In this and other panels, it was widely acknowledged that it is vital to address the issue of a creating a democratic political culture through education in order to create a widespread understanding of democracy among the populace of any country. There was broad agreement that it is necessary to develop a strategy that centers on introducing education for democracy into the school curriculum at every level, and that the curriculum of each country would vary according to the history and culture of that country. Nonetheless, while history and culture would shape presentation of the subject, certain universal values, it was agreed, must be at the core of each curriculum. Such education serves to inform citizens, especially those at the grassroots about their rights, and affects all levels of society. It was agreed that a society that invests in democracy education reaps reward in areas of gender equality, increased participation in the political process at all levels, freedom for each citizen, participation in decision-making processes, and promotion of a strong and active civil society. Gender equality and advancement of African culture are essential elements of democracy education and should be incorporated in teaching about democracy in Africa. Recommended Actions
Statement of the Problem: Premise: Rule of law is critical to the stability of democracies.
Major Recommendation: Where they do not currently exist, each country should create permanent, independent Electoral Commissions. Elections are not discrete events but are a process. Specific Recommendations:
Participants deliberated on the following resolution as passed by the Nongovernmental International Steering Committee and the Executive Board of the World Movement for Democracy. While affirming strong for the principle of free association and the essence of the resolution the panel formed a group to study the resolution and draft a separate resolution in order to present its own perspective on the issue. Herewith the May 25 Resolution as presented to the Convening Group of the Community of Democracies by the Nongovernmental International Steering Committee: BEGIN RESOLUTION Recognizing that the Community of Democracies in its founding Warsaw Declaration affirmed its “determination to work together to promote and strengthen democracy”, thereby acknowledging democracy promotion as an international norm: We express our concern over the growing number of countries that have enacted or introduced legislation designed to restrict the democracy promotion efforts of nongovernmental organizations, and toward that end we call on all participants in the Community of Democracies to uphold the right of governments and nongovernmental organizations to provide material and technical assistance to support NGO efforts to promote and consolidate democracy. We express concern over efforts to suppress democratic promotion activities. We request that such efforts to repress democracy promotion activity should cease and that any existing legal restrictions toward that end be repealed. We further call on the members of the Community of Democracies to affirm in the strongest possible terms the rights of nongovernmental organizations to promote democracy in support of the rights defined in the Warsaw Declaration. Countries engaged in activities in violation of these rights and these internationally accepted norms should be excluded from participation in the Community of Democracies. END RESOLUTION Panel #8 Integrating Political Parties in the CD Nongovernmental Process Since the Warsaw Declaration the role of political party participation within the Community of Democracies has been addressed as an issue to consider. Consideration was given to this issue during the Seoul and Santiago meetings, but no decision had been taken. The first meeting of the International Steering Committee in Bamako took the decision to find a way to include political parties in the NGP, possibly through the inclusion of the four party Internationals, but no resolution to this inclusion resulted. A working group formed of NDI, WFD, NIMD and Participa initiated a draft TOR. After the Bamako meeting NIMD and NDI went onto elaborate the draft TOR. A formula for inclusion of political parties is in its final stages and will be considered by the International Steering Committee later this year. Political parties are key actors in the democratic process. They have a specific status and role because they are neither government nor NGO, and therefore can play a critical role in the CD NGP. Prior to agreement on the inclusion of political parties in the broader nongovernmental process NIMD and NDI initiated some activities in collaboration with the Malian Executive Secretariat in Bamako: Augustine Cisse from NIMD introduced these activities. On May 20th 2006, an information session organized by the ES to introduce the CD and the road map of Mali’s presidency to the Malian political parties. During this workshop, the ES shared the topics addressed by the NGOs as priorities for discussion. The Malian political parties saw it as important for themselves and can discuss these issues with political sensitivities. NIMD took the opportunity of the meeting of political parties from 8 countries on capacity building in Accra in July 2006 to inform them about the CD. Another participant gave an example of partnership between political parties and civil society showing that collective action on a specific issue had more impact and increased trust between the two partners. The debate following the presentations highlighted some key questions: What types of partnership? What types of partnership to make impact? How are civil society and political party interests to be reconciled? Recommendations
Panel #9 Free Enterprise and Democracy A lively debate on the role of the private sector failed to achieve consensus on the boundaries between what the private sector should do vis-à-vis government. It was agreed that the issue would be raised within the framework of the African Democracy Forum in the coming year to produce a greater consensus on the issues related to free enterprise. Recommendations
Participants supported the role of the U.N. democracy caucus in promoting reforms based on democratic values. They strongly supported the concept of the U.N. Democracy Fund (UNDEF) and urged member states to heed the call of the Secretary General to renew their contributions to it. They indicated that they will closely follow events at the U.N. concerning such issues as the evolution of the Human Rights Council. Participants felt the inclusion of the ISC in the UN Democracy Caucus proceedings to be an important opportunity to project the views of civil society in international fora. Panel #11 the Role of the African Democracy Forum (ADF) in the Community of Democracies (CD) The ADF currently is focused on four issues:
Ambassador Istvan Gyarmati, President of the ICDT introduced the Centre to participants in the Bamako Roundtable. The ICDT was created in Hungary six months ago this year. It is now fully operational and ready to play a role in Africa. In the past few years many transitional democracies have experience failures. The problem is that many do not know the path to follow. The ICDT collects the experiences of transitional democracies not just in Central and East Europe, but also in such countries as South Korea, Chile and Spain among others. Rather than aiming to promote democracy in general, ICDT sets more concrete and pragmatic goals: we concentrate on democratic transition as a process. ICDT does not aim at regime change. We seek to be helpful to people. We work with local partners in order to ensure the effectiveness of our advice. Our projects are carefully planned to take local conditions into account. Ambassador Gyarmati summarized three current ICDT projects:
ICDT announced its intention to seek project proposals from Africa and to cooperate with projects intended to strengthen democracy in Africa. |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|



